Quote:For many years, fans of Warhawk were waiting for a successor to the game that soaked up hours upon hours of their time. It was never a game that blew anyone away with amazing visuals. No, where Warhawk excelled was its engaging gameplay. So when rumours of a game called Starhawk started buzzing around, the fan base got rather excited. After all, while Warhawk was primarily a terrestrial-based combat game, Starhawk promised to be a game that saw space combat become a realistic possibility. Those aspirations were never truly realised, but Starhawk is still a game that should be considered a worthy successor; it brings a lot to the table.

Full Story: Starhawk Review

---

Twitter: @DarrylGU

It's when I see "The Bad" that I question paying $60.

---

-Jared

^When I see "The Bad", I question paying the $90 that it's selling for on Aussie selves

---

ehh...I need a lot of convincing to buy this game, I played Warhawk back in the day but I don't know if I want to play this.

---

(May 21, 2012 09:19:18 PM)jmsmm_92 Wrote:  It's when I see "The Bad" that I question paying $60.

Although a lot of the elements are the same, it's certainly a very different game this time around. If you can get some extensive time with it, I recommend you do so.

---

Twitter: @DarrylGU