(November 05, 2011 10:34:59 AM)gilburtgtr Wrote:  I don't know whether I would have given this a 9 or a 10, I'll get back to you on that one. What I will say, having played a decent amount now is that there are noticeable improvements from 2 to 3 in terms of gameplay (campaign)...

How can you say you can see a lot of improvement, but ultimately give it a score 2 points lower than UC2? XD Explain?

---

(November 05, 2011 10:34:59 AM)gilburtgtr Wrote:  [*]I don't think the places we visit are any less prominent than in UC2, and I am enjoying the variety of environments.
[/list]

I still enjoyed the review though, and agree with pretty much everything else so far.

My complaint was more the flow of it - I felt that you didn't get to spend enough time in each of the locations and they didn't feel expansive enough.

I'm glad you liked the review though - took me quite a while to get that bad boy down.

---

Twitter: @DarrylGU

(November 06, 2011 05:11:56 AM)Chloe Wrote:  How can you say you can see a lot of improvement, but ultimately give it a score 2 points lower than UC2? XD Explain?

*careful not to incite a fangirl's rage* ^ ^ 1 or 0 points lower score Clo. I was specifically talking about the mechanics of the gameplay. One of the complaints I had about UC2 was that playing through the game, Drake's movements were sometimes not very smooth - a little unrefined. Things like, aiming to grab a blatant ledge but missing, or rolling instead of taking cover. These things have been massively improved upon IMO, as well as the flow of CQC, for example. I feel like the game falls down a little more elsewhere. Character development for the more minor characters seems scarce, for example. But like I said, I may still give it a 10 yet, I haven't finished it though!

(November 06, 2011 07:51:30 AM)Darryl Wrote:  I'm glad you liked the review though - took me quite a while to get that bad boy down.

Hah I bet it did, especially when you knew Chloe would be scrutinising every word of it!

---